| Tuesday, September 28, 2010 |
| Authorial Intent & "Christian" Music |
I enjoy newly written songs that express the Christian faith. Every now and then you stumble across a song that musically is easy to learn and easy to sing. As the pastor of our church, I also enjoy introducing new songs to our congregation. Introducing new songs not only encourages the congregation to grow musically, but it also keeps them aware of "what" they are singing. There are times when singing an "oldie but goodie" that we go on auto-pilot and forget the meaning of the lyrics and gospel message. But great care must be administered when selecting songs (newer or older) to introduce to the church because not all songs express the Christian faith clearly and some songs are contrary to the Christian faith even if they carry the label "Christian."
For example, the following lyrics were written by a "Christian" musician.
Oh, how could it be That my God would welcome me Into this mystery Say take this bread, take this wine Now the simple made divine For any to receive
This musicians songs are sung in a large portion of churches today. But when you discover the background of the worship leader, you discover that his theology is Catholic. And while it could be true that many of his songs express true Christian doctrine, one should expect some songs to carry theology that is distinctly Catholic.
Knowing that this musician is Catholic, I have to wonder what he meant when he penned the lyrics "now the simple made divine." The song, being about communion, would seem to work musically and lyrically. But when put it up to a doctrinal test, it would seem that it fails the test of true doctrine--if I correctly understand the author's intent. In Catholic theology, the view of communion is that the elements of bread and wine become the true body and blood of Christ--transubstantiation. In the words of the musician, the "simple [is] made divine." If that is what the author intended to say, then this should not be a song sung in Protestant churches. If the Catholic author intented to say something else, then his lyrics are ambiguous at best.
Unfortunately, most musicians don't offer a commentary on all of their songs and indeed it seems that many might even allow a vast array of interprations of their songs as long as it encouraged others in the "faith" and in their "walk with God." What the songs "meant to you" and what it "did for you" can in no way be the means of authenticating it's message. As always Scripture alone is the rule of belief and practice. And if one is writing a song to express Christian doctrine, then one should be clear in what he/she is intending to say. In this case, the message seems clear enough and thus the song would not pass the test of right doctrine.
A word of caution would be helpful for all of us. Just because someone writes one or two theological correct songs, doesn't mean that all of their songs are given a free pass. Always be discerning and remember that is the habit of Satan to subtly introduce heresy into the church. Labels: authorial intent, Doctrine, music, Worship |
posted by Joshua Ritchie @ 12:38 PM  |
|
|
|
| Friday, May 21, 2010 |
| It's All About Love...No, It's All About Christ |
Since the inception of our church I have tried to impress upon my brothers and sisters that all of Scripture is about Christ. To hear a sermon from the Old Testament or New Testament and to not have Christ as the aim or focal point is to have a Christless sermon—a non-Christian sermon really. The substance and essence of all Scripture is Jesus Christ Himself. He said so and taught accordingly.
John 5:39-40 You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me, yet you refuse to come to me that you may have life.
Luke 24:27 And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself.
And so in some way, we must always head to Christ from whatever passage we preach from. It was Charles Spurgeon who said, “I take my text and make a bee-line to the cross.” So whether the passage shows us our sin and utter depravity and need for the Savior like in Genesis 3…or whether the passage shows God’s faithfulness in presevering the people through whom Christ would be born like in Genesis 50…or whether the passage gives a prophecy of the work and person of Christ like in Isaiah 55…or whether the passage shows us a type of Christ like Jonah…or whether the passage gives us the wisdom of Christ as in Proverbs…or whether the passage points to the judgment of Christ as in Joel…IT’S ALL ABOUT CHRIST.
My aim in the past three and a half years has been to build this truth into my family and into our church. Naturally, you can understand my joy when my daughter and I had this conversation last night after she read her Bible.
“Macy, what did you read in your Bible?”
She replied, “Dad, I’m a little nervous to tell you.”
“Why? It’s ok if you forget a little. Just pick up your Bible and show me some of the things you learned. Was it about soccer? What is about food? Was it about Jesus?”
”Dad! All Bible stories are about Jesus,” she replied as if I didn’t know and that it should have been obvious to me.
She went on, “Dad. It was hard to understand. I’m not sure if I got it.”
I replied, “Well, it looks like God gave something to Moses. Did he give him some fish? Did he give him a high-five? What did He give him?”
“Commandments,” she said.
The Bible she reads from has some lessons that are designed to teach her essential truths of the faith. This lesson focused on the fact that we can’t know God unless He reveals Himself to us. Thus we see God speaking His Word. Scripture, which is God-breathed, shows us what God is like and what He expects of us.
Our conversation then went on to explaining the point of why God gave us His Law: to show His perfection and our sin, thus our need for Christ’s perfect obedience and His salvation. We had a good chat as she snuggled up into my arms and I told her the gospel story once again from Exodus. Labels: Gospel, Parenting, Scripture |
posted by Joshua Ritchie @ 10:04 AM  |
|
|
|
| Wednesday, April 28, 2010 |
| Spooky...Really Spooky! |
Here's an article from the Founders Blog that points to some folks who are trying desperately to stop pastors from preaching of the doctrines of grace...or Calvinism as it is commonly referred to.
As a church who is unashamedly Calvinistic and Reformed, let us pray for our brothers and sisters who endure persecution and suffering for preaching the undiluted, pure and refreshing gospel of Christ.Labels: Calvinsm, Reformed Theology |
posted by Joshua Ritchie @ 9:41 AM  |
|
|
|
| Tuesday, April 27, 2010 |
| Gubment & Powerpoint |
This article makes and interesting point concerning Powerpoint in the military. Here are two excerpts from the article.
"Commanders say that behind all the PowerPoint jokes are serious concerns that the program stifles discussion, critical thinking and thoughtful decision-making. Not least, it ties up junior officers — referred to as PowerPoint Rangers — in the daily preparation of slides, be it for a Joint Staff meeting in Washington or for a platoon leader’s pre-mission combat briefing in a remote pocket of Afghanistan."
"In a daytime telephone conversation, he estimated that he spent an hour each day making PowerPoint slides. In an initial e-mail message responding to the request for an interview, he wrote, 'I would be free tonight, but unfortunately, I work kind of late (sadly enough, making PPT slides).'"
Not that I am against the use of Powerpoint in a sermon, but this article got me thinking about the rampant use of Powerpoint in our worship services. I wonder if the church has the same problems. Are we spending much valuable time and resources on diagrams and bullet points...and not enough time with people or in sermon preparation or in evangelism? Would our families be healthier if we dropped the 30 slide presentation and spent more time with them? Can Powerpoint reduce critical thinking or stifle discussion? Can Powerpoint give the mistaken notion that Biblical matters, sin issues and doctrinal issues can be reduced to bullets?
Again, I don't want to dismiss the use of PPT, but surely an overuse can trivialize or pollute or blurr the message of Scripture. On Sunday, will the focus be on Christ or on a slide presentation? If the PPT show towers above Christ then it's time for it to go. |
posted by Joshua Ritchie @ 9:39 AM  |
|
|
|
| Thursday, February 25, 2010 |
| Divine Sovereignty & Human Responsibility In Prayer & Temptation |
Pray that God would not lead you into temptation (Matthew 6:13). When that prayer goes unanswered, rejoice (James 1:2-4) at what God is doing!
When you fall into temptation, resist the evil one (James 4:7). Then give thanks to God (Psalm 19:13) for answering your prayer according to Matthew 6:13. Labels: Prayer, temptation |
posted by Joshua Ritchie @ 12:42 PM  |
|
|
|
| Friday, February 12, 2010 |
| Justification By Works? |
| "These good works are evidence of the true nature of these people. Notice the response of the righteous (Matthew 25:31-40). These believers are clearly not sitting around waiting to be justified by their works. When Jesus commends them for what they have done, they humbly respond by saying, "When did we do this?" That does not sound like folk who are waiting to be justified by works, waiting to be saved by works. Instead they are completely stunned that Jesus would even mention their works." -- J. Ligon Duncan, Fear Not: Death and the Afterlife from a Christian Perspective, page 79 Labels: Grace, justification |
posted by Joshua Ritchie @ 11:23 PM  |
|
|
|
|
| virtual morsels for the mentally insatiable appetite |
| About Me |
|

Name: Joshua Ritchie
Home: Victorville, Ca
About Me: Joshua Ritchie - child of God, husband, father, pastor, car salesman.
See my complete profile
|
| Previous Snacks |
|
| Archives |
|
|
| Digesta |
|
| Vomere |
|
| Sites To See |
|
| Blogs To Read |
|
Powered by |
 |
|